Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Insert Random Opportunity Quote Here

Law #13: Humans are innately opportunistic.
The pic?  Why that's the Opportunity Mars rover.  It has absolutely nothing to do with this post other than it's called Opportunity.

I got to thinking that whoever coined the phrase "crimes of opportunity" wasn't too far off from unlocking the true nature of humans.  The concept is simple.  People are perfectly ok with lying, cheating, and stealing so long as they are provided with the opportunity.  The average human's ability to find opportunity is almost instinctual.  The ability shoots to astronomical levels when people are aware they can actually exhort opportunity without fear of retribution.

It's not particularly a bad instinct though.  It's just bad most of the time.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Daddy Needs A New Pair Of Shoes!

Law #12: There is no luck; only numbers.
So played any games of chance lately?  There's a reason they're called games of chance.  Chances are you're gonna lose.  Webster defines luck as "a force that brings good fortune or adversity" and "the events or circumstances that operate for or against an individual".  Truth is it's all about probabilities.  Crunch enough probabilities and you'll find they're mostly working against you.

I say this as a warning. If you're waiting for your "luck" to change then you really oughta stop waiting and do something.  Waiting puts the probability of things happening at about 0.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Simon Pegg Gets It

Law #11: Don't be afraid to be who you are.  Life is too short to pretend to be someone you aren't.
 I ran across this image on Google+ (don't ask) and I knew right away I should make a law about it.  If you're here then you're most likely familiar with my other blog: The Renegade Geek.  Believe it or not (I know some of you are too young to rem...oh never mind), there was a time when geek and nerd culture were ridiculed and considered outcasts.  Well yours truly was always a geek.  I'll let you draw your own images of what that was like for me.  However, I was always me and I don't regret that.  Since I spent so much time on the outside looking in, I was a keen observer.  I noticed that people tended to put on a mask to fit in and hid their interests and talents if they felt it would threaten their acceptance.  You're probably looking back on your younger years right now thinking about that one thing you loved but you knew it would brand you if you were ever caught practicing it.  And now you're probably thinking about how much time you wasted doing so when you could have been doing THAT.

Simon's right.  Being a geek IS extremely liberating.  It's about saying "Hey world, this is me and I don't really care what you think about that.".  In that respect, we can all be geeks. 

Monday, December 24, 2012

Duck...Duck...Goose!

Law #10: Only once you've claimed your space does anyone more space show up.

I think we've all been here at some point in time.  You're in a large parking lot packed to the brim and you're looking for a spot.  You have to cruise through the entire lot for a good 15 minutes before you find ANY space.  You're not to happy with were the spot is but since there aren't any more you happily take it.  Then it happens.  As you're walking to your destination you spot an empty spot...then another...then another.  Where were all these spots when you were looking?

Wanna have some more fun?  Go back to your car and try to get that spot you just saw.  It'll probably be gone.  Oh well, back to where...oh, now that spot's gone too.

I think that's kind of a metaphor for life.  We spend a long time looking for a place to fit in and not finding it.  When we find a place that feels comfortable, opportunities start springing up.  But these opportunities demand you give up your currently held comfortable spot.  So what do you do?  Do you drop your comfort zone and check out this new spot or do you stay put?

You weren't looking for advice in the post were you?  Because I don't have any.  I'm just making an observation. Either stick with your spot or try the other.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Lincoln Was An Optimist

Law #9:  Pleasing everyone is an impossibility.
Personally, I hate the word "impossible".  I prefer "improbable".  Sorry, but impossible applies here.  You see, in order for everyone to be pleased consensus must be reached.  However, there are people who are simply incapable of moving with consensus.  Those who do are either ostracized or ignored in modern society.  People only start to pay attention to them when they reach a consensus comparable to the previously established one.  Add the fact that consensus is relative to location and this law's accuracy increases exponentially.

So where does that leave us?  Well just because we can't please everyone doesn't mean we can't please a lot of people.  And really, who cares about pleasing EVERYONE (except for politicians but they do a fair amount of fibbing for their living)?  How about pleasing YOURSELF and the people you care about the most?  There are people who are going to gripe and complain no matter what you do so you should really just live for you.

By the way, here's Abraham Lincoln's complete quote:
You can please some of the people some of the time all of the people some of the time some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time.

***Disclaimer*** If it pleases you to break the laws of modern society I hope you'll be pleased with your jail cell.  Just sayin'.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Awkwaaaaard...

Law #8:  There's never really going to be a good time to post anything on social media.
Available here...so they don't sue me for borrowing their pic.
There's a tragedy right now in America.  27 people, mostly children, were shot and killed at a Connecticut Elementary School.  Rightfully there is a lot of sadness, grief and anger over what has happened.  Just check your social media wall and see for yourself. 

Now this is a despicable crime and personally I think we should reconsidering bringing back the guillotine just for this guy but that's not what this post is really about.  It's about all the other folks who use social media and are posting right now and have no idea this all just happened.  They're going to look back at what they were posting at this very moment totally unaware of what tragedy has transpired and they're gonna feel like total douches for posting what they posted.

There just isn't ever going to be an appropriate time for posting the stuff you normally post on social media.  Heck, I'm not even sure what I'm posting now is appropriate.  When you're posting how much fun you're having fun doing something, someone else on your list is going to be posting that a relative just died.  When you're posting how much agony you're in because you burned your hand on the stove someone else on your list is going to posting just how good the food is at that new teppanyaki place.

Your time is always going to suck...and that's ok.  People didn't add you to their social media list for you to be appropriate all the time and cheer them up and be that one sunshiny bright spot on the web for them.  They did it because they want to stay in touch with you and what's going on in your life.

Right now, it's ok to mourn.  But if you look back on what you were posting not knowing what was going on you shouldn't feel bad about that.  Don't apologize either.  You were just being you and that's all we ever asked for.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

How About Fantasyland?

Law #7: You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

This entry's title refers to the 1986 comedy Back To School.  Rather than try to explain it here's the actual scene.


Granted, Rodney Dangerfield is the "hero" in this story but in this clip he's just dead wrong.  Though Dangerfield's character is a successful businessman, he's here injecting his own methods and procedures into what has been established as standard factual business teaching material.  Yes, it's still funny but that leads me to the point of this entry.

I'm a scientist.  I started out in the marine sciences and later expanded to computer science.  Biology, chemistry, zoology, etc.  If there was an -ology after it there's a good chance I studied it at some point or another.  In science we rely on facts.  You see, we can't EVER assume things.  Mostly at the time it was because if we did we'd probably get a failing grade on our report.  The bigger picture though was that if our results could not reproduced we don't get to call it a fact.  It's like we just made it up.

So why the rant?  Because lately (and by lately I mean pretty much my entire life) science has found itself under fire simply for stating facts that prove to be inconvenient for certain people.  By certain people I mean politicians. Despite my political affiliation I've said time and again that anytime politicians make an effort to regulate science they are bound to just screw it up.  I'll let author Michael Crichton, who himself was a scientist, explain why:

“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.

Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”
Here's my issue.  Too often I see facts twisted, bent, obliterated and even ignored just to push an certain agenda.  The people pushing this agenda feel that if they can get consensus on their side then the facts are irrelevant.  Then once they've achieved that consensus, they act as if the consensus is fact.  It's not.  Period.

Oh, and Rodney does eventually learn the material.